WorkFirst HandBook
Tools
3.6 Sanctions and Non-compliance sanction policy
The Sanctions and Non-Compliance Sanction Policy section is divided in three separate sub-sections:
- Section 3.6.1 - Sanctions describes how to make the sanction decision and work with the family during the first three months of sanction. This section includes:
- 3.6.1.1 What are sanctions?
- 3.6.1.2 How long do sanctions last?
- 3.6.1.3 Good cause appointment/Sanction case staffing letter
- 3.6.1.4 Good cause 10-day period
- 3.6.1.5 Steps for the sanction case staffing
- 3.6.1.6 Good Cause Criteria
- 3.6.1.7 Sanction Case Staffing & Sanction Case Staffing Documentation Standard
- 3.6.1.8 Sanction Review Criteria
- 3.6.1.9 Adverse action notice
- 3.6.1.10 Dependent Teens in Sanction
- 3.6.1.11 Sanction CE and IRP Requirements
- 3.6.1.12 Curing a Sanction
- 3.6.1.13 Cures & Changes in circumstances
- 3.6.1.14 How to resolve procedural issues & reapply sanction penalties
- 3.6.1.15 eJAS/ACES Codes
- 3.6.1.16 Sanctions - Step-by-Step Guide
- Section 3.6.2 - Non-Compliance Sanction Policy describes what happens if a person decides to stay in sanction for more than three months.
- Section 3.6.3 - NCS Reapplications describes how to process reapplications when a case has been closed by the SRP.
3.6.1 Sanction Policy
3.6.1.1 What are sanctions?
Under WorkFirst, sanctions are a tool of last resort in an ongoing attempt to promote participation and help families achieve self-sufficiency.
A sanction is a penalty that reduces the family's WorkFirst cash assistance by the person's share, or 40%, whichever is more. We impose a sanction penalty when a person is able, but refuses without good cause to:
- Provide information needed to develop the Individual Responsibility Plan (IRP), including completing any required Comprehensive Evaluation(s),
- Show up for scheduled appointments with the people who provide WorkFirst services and follow participation and attendance rules,
- Sign the IRP,
- Do IRP activities, or
- Accept a job (that meets the criteria in WAC 388-310-1500).
If we discover a person is unable to participate in the activities in the IRP, we may:
- Revise the IRP to appropriate activity;
- Defer; or
- Exempt the person from participation.
3.6.1.2 How long do sanctions last?
We count months of sanction because adults who stay in sanction for six months in a row (or three months if the case was previously closed for non-compliance sanction), without good cause may lose their cash assistance. September 2006 begins the start of counting of months in sanction, even if a person has been in sanction before that date.
If a sanctioned person exits WorkFirst cash assistance and reapplies within six months, the person is still in sanction status when the case is reopened. The sanction count continues where it left off before the case was closed. For example, a WorkFirst cash assistance case is closed effective December 1, 2006, while in the third month of sanction. If the person reapplies in:
- February 2007, it will be month four of sanction if the case is reopened.
- June 2007, there is no sanction if the case is reopened and the monthly sanction count will be reset to zero.
3.6.1.3 Good Cause Appointment/Sanction Case Staffing Letter
When a person is not participating as required, the WFPS/SW will receive an immediate notification from the service provider. When this occurs, the WFPS/SW determines whether or not the parent had a good reason for not participating.
The first step is to set up a good cause appointment with the person to find out if there is a good reason for not participating. During this time, the eJAS component codes for the activities will remain open until a good cause determination has been made. See How do we treat excused and unexcused absences step-by-step.
All the steps of the good cause process must be followed, even if you are able to reach the person by phone to discuss the situation. . You need to complete and document the thorough review of the case and that the person had the opportunity to explain the non-participation.
WAC 388-310-1600(2)(a) states we must always send a good cause letter and give the parent 10 calendar days to provide information about why there may “good cause” for not complying. This is done by sending a good cause letter to schedule an appointment and giving the family 10 days to contact us.
This ensures:
- We meet policy and legal requirements,
- More than one person is involved in making the sanction decision,
- The parent has an opportunity to bring someone with them to their case staffing/good cause appointment.
If you give a parent less than 10 calendar days to establish good cause or make the good cause determination over the phone without sending a letter, the case is not procedurally correct and the sanction is invalid.
Remember that persons closed by the Sanction Review Panel, reopened, and sanctioned again, may lose cash after three months in a row of sanction. See section 3.6.3, Non-compliance sanction reapplications, for more information about how to complete all sanction and non-compliance sanction steps, including good cause and sanction letters, within a three-month timeframe.
3.6.1.4 Good Cause 10-day Period
WAC 388-310-1600(2)(b) states parents have 10 days to contact us when they don't meet WorkFirst requirements so they can talk to us about the situation. Parents can contact us in writing, by phone, by going to the appointment described in their good cause letter or by asking for a different appointment time.
In counting the 10 days, day 1 begins when the “good cause” letter is mailed or given to the parent. This is the same as how we count the 10-day period for adverse action notices. You must allow for an additional business day when the letter is not mailed out the same day that it is generated (either locally or centrally printed in Olympia). If the 10th day falls on a weekend or holiday, the parent has until the following business day to provide the information requested.
Document in eJAS if you handed the parent the good cause letter or printed it locally and placed it in outgoing CSO mail before the afternoon local mail cutoff.
Examples:
All examples assume that today's date is 2/28/2007:
- A WFPS locally prints and hands the good cause letter to the parent in the office. The date on the letter is 2/28/07. Document in eJAS that you handed the parent the letter on 2/28/07.
Day 1 is 2/28/07 and Day 10 is 3/9/07.
- A WFPS locally prints and places the good cause letter in outgoing CSO mail before the afternoon local mail cutoff. The date on the letter is 2/28/07. Document in eJAS the letter was mailed out locally on 2/28/07.
Day 1 is 2/28/07 and Day 10 is 3/9/07.
- A WFPS locally prints and places the good cause letter in outgoing CSO mail after the afternoon local mail cutoff. Therefore, the letter is presumed to be mailed the next business day. The date on the letter is 2/28/07. Since 3/10/07 falls on a weekend, the parent has until the end of the next business day (3/12/07) to provide good cause.
Day 1 is 3/1/07 and Day 10 is 3/12/07.
- A WFPS chooses central print to mail the good cause letter to the parent. The letter will be mailed out the next business day. The date on the letter is 2/28/07. Since 3/10/07 falls on a weekend, the parent has until the end of the next business day (3/12/07) to provide good cause.
Day 1 is 3/1/07 and Day 10 is 3/12/07.
3.6.1.5 Steps for the Sanction Case Staffing
- Mail a good cause (WorkFirst Non-Participation 085-01) appointment letter to the person. The appointment date must be within the 10-day good cause period
- Comply with any limited-English proficiency (LEP) and Equal Access (EA) plans so you can communicate effectively with the non-participating person.
- Document any information the person gives you about the non-participation (phone calls or documents).
- Conduct a sanction case staffing during the good cause appointment to decide whether to initiate a sanction for refusal to participate without good cause. (Follow the procedures in section 3.5 Case Staffing to set up the staffing and document the results.)
- Include the following people in the case staffing:
- The non-participating person if there for the good cause appointment.
- Anyone the non-participating person decides to bring.
- Invite at least two other relevant professionals, such as a social worker or persons from other agencies that have worked with the person. A minimum of two professionals are required to conduct the case staffing. Remember that the assigned worker (WFPS or WFSW) count as one professional. In no case can a case manager be the only one making a decision to sanction.
- Children's Administration (CA) staff if they are working with the family. Families involved with CA may be required to do activities like counseling or treatment to help keep their family together. These activities must be supported and incorporated into the IRP. CA staff can help re-engage the parent and into moving towards in a more positive direction.
If the person fails to come to the good cause appointment/sanction case staffing:
- Determine whether the person was able to participate (in the required activities as outlined in the IRP) during the sanction case staffing based on whatever information is available (such as case notes, information from other professionals and medical records).
- Use the Case Staffing Result Letter to document that the waiving of the opportunity to attend and to describe the outcome of the staffing.
- If the case staffing results in sanction, try to re-engage the person by contacting them in another way (such as call or visit their home) to discuss the benefits of participation and how to cure sanction. Remember not to send the adverse notice until the person has had 10 days to contact us.
3.6.1.6 Good Cause Criteria
Our goal is to involve people in WorkFirst activities to increase their family's ability to earn a living and provide support for their children, not to place them in sanction status. It is very important to determine and document whether a person is refusing, or unable to comply. If a person is unable to comply and tells us why, then we can work more effectively with that person and his or her family.
We need to be particularly careful not to place people in sanction status who do not comply because they do not have affordable or appropriate child care, and don't know what help is available. There is a special brochure (WorkFirst Opportunities Brochure DSHS 22-1125 ) that you can use to give basic Child Care information to all persons who face sanction.
Anyone who is not fully participating as required has good cause if they are unable to do the required WorkFirst activities, or if there are significant barriers outside of their control that prevent full participation. Problems that may prevent compliance, and that should be reviewed with every individual before being placed in sanction may include having:
- An unmet need for Equal Access services (EA).
- Limited-English proficiency (LEP), not addressed through interpreters or translations that result in the person not understanding what is required.
- Emergent or severe medical condition (verified by health care professional) of the person or a family member they care for.
- Mental health or chemical dependency issues.
- Family violence.
- Immediate legal concerns.
Determination of good cause requires a change in the IRP to reflect the appropriate activities and level of services the person needs to successfully participate in the program.
Non-participation due to unexcused absences will not be considered good cause unless there is a significant circumstance outside of the person's control, such as family violence or hospitalization that made it impossible for the person to call in to get the absence excused.
3.6.1.7 Sanction Case Staffing & Sanction Case Staffing Documentation Standard
The sanction case staffing is conducted after the good cause determination to determine the next appropriate step based on all available information.. The person could be placed in sanction or be re-engaged. In addition to the case staffing guidelines established under 3.5.1 What is a Case Staffing? Go over the following as you go through the case staffing:
- Compliance with any LEP and EA plans so you can communicate as effectively as possible with the non-participating person.
- Give the non-participating person a written request for any additional proof needed to make the good cause decision.
- Discuss how participation will help them and their family.
- Make sure the person has an opportunity to participate, which may include:
- Changing IRP requirements if different WorkFirst activities will help the person move towards independence and employment sooner.
- Providing support services the person needs to participate.
- Providing an exemption if the person is unable to participate.
- Describe the sanction penalties, what happens if a person stays in sanction and how to end the sanction.
- Decide whether the person had good cause for failure to participate.
- Document issues discussed and the results of the case staffing. Explain why the department decided to sanction, if appropriate, and use the Sanction Case Staffing Documentation Standard.
Sanction Case Staffing Documentation Standard: In addition to the eJAS Case Staffing documentation, you must include the following information:
- Document that all available information was reviewed and discussed with one or more professionals, and
- An explanation of the decision whether or not to pursue sanction.
Remember: Do not send the adverse notice until the person has had 10 days to contact us.
3.6.1.8 Sanction Review Criteria
The sanction review criteria are a required eJAS module to be completed if you determine the person did not have good cause for failure to participate. The purpose is to document that the sanction process was followed and the person was given every opportunity to participate. Specifically, the sanction review criteria documents the following:
- Does the IRP clearly outline what activity was required and does it match the reason for the sanction?
- The date the person agreed to the IRP and was given or mailed a copy.
- Did the person know what was required in the IRP and did he or she sign the IRP in the office?
- If the person was mailed a copy of the IRP, did the person return the signed IRP within 10 days?
- Is there any reason to believe the person is not receiving their mail (i.e., no mail returned to us by the post office)?
- Has the person been screened for family violence issues?
- If yes, is family violence a current barrier to participation?
- Is the person receiving EA services?
- If the person was not identified in ACES as EA, is there any indication an EA screening should be done before making the sanction decision?
- Is the EA Plan being followed?
- Has the person requested interpreter services or translated letters and notices?
- Are the person's IRP and letters translated?
- The date of the eJAS note documenting what the person failed to do as outlined in their IRP
- Was the person given an opportunity to establish good cause and told what IRP activities they did not do?
- In reviewing the case, did the department identify any new barriers to participation?
- If yes, did the department respond appropriately to barriers we knew about that would make it difficult or impossible for a person to successfully participate in WorkFirst activities?
- Was a sanction case staffing done during the good cause appointment with two appropriate professionals?
- If the person did not show up for the sanction case staffing, the sanction decision was based on the available information.
- Did we invite Children's Administration staff if they are working with the family?
- If the person attended the case staffing, was the following discussed:
- Re-engagement
- Benefits of Participation
- Non-Compliance Sanction Policy
- How to cure the sanction
- The opportunity to build a new IRP
- Did supervisory staff review and approve the sanction?
- List additional comments, as needed, about why the department decided the sanction is appropriate.
3.6.1.9 Adverse Action Notice
The department cannot sanction parents when an adequate time frame of 10 days was not provided. The earliest date you can make the sanction decision and send out the adverse action notice depends on whether the parent contacts you within the 10-day good cause period.
- Contact from parent within the 10 days good cause period: When parents contact us to tell us they will not participate or do not have a good cause anytime during the 10-day period, the notice of adverse action can be issued. The department does not have to wait until the 10th day to issue the adverse action notice. Document the contact and the parent's statements in eJAS.
- Incomplete information from parent within the 10 days: When a parent provides some information but not everything needed to make a good cause determination, the department must inform the parent in writing what else is needed and allow a reasonable amount of additional time to respond. A reasonable amount of time is not necessarily 10 days. This second request does not make the first good cause letter invalid. Send an updated good cause letter with the date this information is due.
- No contact within the 10-days: When a parent does not respond at all and does not attend the scheduled good cause meeting, the department must wait until the 10th day to send the adverse action notice. However, if the parent contacts you and establishes good cause by the end of the 10th day, you must rescind the adverse action letter.
- Simultaneous notice of non-participation and intent to not participate: A parent may tell you that she or he does not intend to participate at the same time you find out that she or he has not been participating. When this occurs, hand the parent a good cause letter or mail the letter out. See 3.6.1.3, the "good cause appointments/sanction case staffing letter" section for more information.
- The adverse action letter addressed to head of household must specify the name of the person in the household who is being placed in sanction.
- This applies for both one and two parent households.
WAC 388-310-1600(4) states once we decide that a parent did not have a good reason for failing to meet WorkFirst requirements, we must tell the parent what he or she failed to do. This must be added to the parent's adverse action notice. We must tell the parent how to cure their sanction.
The parent needs to know what in the Individual Responsibility Plan was not complied with. This is particularly important when there is more than one activity. We must state who did not do the activity as there may be more than one mandatory participant in the family.
To summarize, include the following information in the adverse action letter:
- Who is being placed in sanction (specific person)
- What they failed to do (specific activity in IRP)
- That the specific person is in sanction status
- The penalties that will be applied to the grant
- When the penalties will be applied
- Fair hearing rights
- How to end the penalties and get out of sanction status
Please note that staff only needs to enter the information corresponding to the first three bullets. The rest of the information is automatically printed on the letter.
If these points are not met in the notice of adverse action, then the requirements have not been met and the family cannot be placed in sanction status.
3.6.1.10 Dependent Teens in Sanction
WAC 388-310-1600 (9) states dependent teens, age 16 or older, which are placed in sanction status are not subject to the non-compliance sanction process and household termination described in this section 3.6.2. Once the decision is made to sanction (via the sanction review criteria and supervisory approval of the decision):
- Complete the CE foundation with the dependent teens as described in 3.6.1.8 below.
- Attempt to re-engage the sanctioned teen.
- Enter the "EX" extension code on the ACES WORK screen in the "Closure Delay Reason" field.
- Never refer these cases to the Sanction Review Panel.
The "EX" exception to rule code in the "Closure Delay Reason" field will allow the case to remain active on WorkFirst while in sanction. The coding will also allow you to create reports to track these cases and continue re-engagement efforts.
3.6.1.11 Sanction CE and IRP Requirements
Every sanctioned person must complete a CE after entering sanction status. Dependent teens age 16 are not normally required to complete a CE but must complete the CE foundation in order to cure sanction. The CE ensures the sanctioned person and their families are in the most appropriate activities to meet their needs and to help them move out of sanction.
CE process:
- Schedule (via an appointment letter) the CE foundation for the sanctioned person.
- Complete the foundation,
- Refer only the adults to the college and ESD to complete the rest of the CE, and
- Schedule a follow-up CE appointment.
The person does not require a special "sanction IRP" just because they have entered sanction. Everyone participating in the WorkFirst program is required to have a current IRP based upon his or her activities. If someone enters sanction status, the IRP should reflect the activities not done without good cause. The person must complete a CE and comply with their existing IRP requirements to cure the sanction. The CE requirement is added to the person's IRP.
When the person agrees to cure the sanction, update the IRP with current dates and any new activities needed to meet any new circumstances, including any activities recommended by the CE.
3.6.1.12 Curing a sanction
Once in sanction status, a person must start and continue to do the required WorkFirst activities to cure the sanction. This holds true even if the person was originally sanctioned for failure to provide information or for refusing to accept a job. An individual must do what is in her or his IRP when they entered sanction status unless circumstances change and the IRP is modified (including any changes made as a result of the comprehensive evaluation).
The length of time required to end a sanction is referred to as the "cure period". To cure the sanction, the sanctioned individual must participate for 4 weeks in a row. After four weeks of satisfactory participation, the sanction is removed effective the first of the following month. This same process is used for each subsequent sanction.
3.6.1.13 Cures & changes in circumstances
If circumstances change, a person's grant, IRP and/or cure requirements may change.
- Grant:
- If a sanctioned case is found where the required steps to impose a sanction were not taken, done incorrectly or, the department knew about a barrier to participation and did not respond, then the sanction on the case must be removed back to the original date it was imposed. A supplement must be issued following the established procedures in the EAZ manual under "Benefit Errors -F . Cash and Food Assistance Underpayments ". Follow the instructions in 3.6.1.14 to resolve the procedural error and re-apply the sanction penalty.
- If a person reports a change of circumstance which prevents the person from participating and had not been previously reported, then, once verified, the sanction on the case must be removed the first of the following month after the change of circumstances was reported.
- IRP:
Create a new IRP if: - We did not respond to a barrier we knew about,
- The person discloses a barrier after the fact,
- The person agrees to new activities based on her or his CE, or
- The person's situation changes so he or she can no longer meet prior IRP requirements.
- 4-week cure requirement:
- Anyone able to participate (with a new IRP and participation requirements appropriate to their new circumstances) must comply for 4 weeks before they get a full grant.
- Lift a person's 4-week cure requirement if they enter the third trimester of pregnancy or if their situation is now severe enough that they are exempt and/or cannot (or would not be able to) go through a Comprehensive Evaluation (CE). Remove the sanction penalty the first of the following month.
- Once the cure requirement and sanction are lifted, the person starts over with a clean slate (zero months in sanction).
Examples: A woman is sanctioned for refusing to do job search. Below are three different circumstances with the appropriate response for each.
- #1: She now discloses family violence issues but she is able to move about freely without risk of harm to herself or her children. She must participate in different activities for 4 weeks to get a full cash grant (in her case, go through a CE, followed by a mix of training, job search and family violence counseling).
- #2: The family violence is severe and she is not able to leave her emergency shelter. This woman cannot do a CE, she will be working with a social worker (who verifies her circumstances) and we lift her 4-week cure requirement and remove the sanction penalty the first of the following month.
- #3: No family violence, but the woman is entering her 3rd trimester of pregnancy. We do not require participation during the 3rd trimester, so lift the 4-week cure requirement and remove the sanction penalty the first of the following month.
3.6.1.14 How to Resolve Procedural Errors & Re-apply Sanction Penalties
This process is used whenever you find a case that was sanctioned in error or when the Sanction Review Panel finds a sanction invalid and returns the case to the CSO.
- End the sanction: Send a change letter explaining that we are reinstating full benefits until we resolve a procedural error.
- Restore lost benefits: Remove the sanction on the case back to the original date it was imposed. Issue a supplement following the established procedures in the EAZ manual under "Benefit Errors -F. Cash and Food Assistance Underpayments ".
- 10 - Day good cause requirement: If the sanction was invalid because the 10-day good cause requirements were not met, send out a new good cause letter, describing what the parent did not originally do. Follow the regular sanction process from this point forward to do a sanction case staffing, complete the sanction review checklist and make the sanction decision. If the sanction is found appropriate, send a new adverse action notice (describing what the parent did not originally do) and impose a new sanction. The parent will start over in month 1 of the new sanction.
- Insufficient information in the adverse action notice: If the sanction is invalid because we did not state who did not comply and/or adequately describe what was not done, you will not need to make a new sanction decision. Send out a new adverse action letter naming who and/or describing what the parent originally did not do and impose a new sanction with advance and adequate notice. The parent will start over in month 1 of the new sanction.
- Curing requirements: Allow parents who have already begun to cure their sanction to continue their cure by doing their required activities. If the parent has not started to cure and wishes to re-engage, do a new CE and IRP based on current circumstances. Lift the new sanction after the parent participates for 4 consecutive weeks. See section 3.6.1.13 for a description of when you can lift a person's 4-week cure requirement.
3.6.1.15 eJAS/ACES codes
When someone is sanctioned, use the following ACES and eJAS codes:
- SA (eJAS code indicating the person is in sanction).
- IC (eJAS code showing that a component has been closed incomplete)
- RE (ACES WORK screen sanction code for households 60 months or less on WorkFirst cash assistance)
- SN (ACES WORK/eJAS sanction code for households 61 or more months on WorkFirst cash assistance)
- EX (ACES extension code on the ACES WORK screen/Closure Delay Reason field for dependent teens in sanction)
3.6.1.16 Sanctions – Step-by-step guide
The WFPS or WFSW identifies individuals who are not complying with program requirements and:
- Sends the person the WorkFirst Non-Participation Appointment letter (085-01) scheduling a good cause appointment within 10 calendar days to find out if there is good cause for noncompliance;
- Adds the required text explaining what the person failed to do,
- Adds the following text to the letter regarding the case staffing and who has been invited to attend.
- Schedules and arranges for a sanction case staffing. This case staffing can be scheduled at the same time as the good cause appointment.
- Enters PR component code in eJAS with a scheduled end date that coincides with the good cause appointment date, not to exceed 14 calendar days.
- Determines whether good cause exists or if support services will make participation possible:
- At the appointment with the person (using case staffing selection), or
- If the individual does not attend, the decisions are based on all available information, such as case notes or medical records.
- If the person has good cause,
- Close the PR component code,
- Enter the appropriate codes for the required activities,
- Adjust the IRP,
- Make referrals, and
- Authorize support services as needed.
- If the person does not have good cause:
- Conduct the sanction case staffing if the staffing was scheduled in conjunction with the good cause appointment. (If the case staffing was not previously scheduled, then a separate appointment is needed and the participant invited to the staffing.)
- Invite at least two other relevant professionals, such as a social worker or persons from other agencies that have worked with the person. A minimum of two professionals are required to conduct the case staffing. Remember that the assigned worker (WFPS or WFSW) count as one professional. Other professionals may include Social Workers, ESD WorkFirst employment services counselor, or other agency representatives, such as Children's Administration if they are working with the family.
- Invite the non-participating person to the case staffing.
- Tell them to bring anyone they want to the case staffing.
- Determine through the sanction case staffing process whether a sanction is the next appropriate step by reviewing available information and determining if activities were appropriate. Consider imposing a sanction once the person has had 10 days to contact the department if the review supports it.
- Document issues discussed and the results of the case staffing. Explain why the department decided to sanction. In addition to the eJAS Case Staffing documentation, you must include the following information:
- Document that all available information was reviewed and discussed with one or more professionals, and
- An explanation of the decision whether or not to pursue sanction.
“At this appointment, we will also be reviewing your participation in the WorkFirst program with other involved agency staff. I have invited (List agency staff) to this appointment.”
If you are considering imposing a sanction:
Complete the sanction review criteria in eJAS and get supervisory approval. The sanction process ends here for dependent teens, except for continued efforts to re-engage them and get them back in school.
- Complete or schedule the CE foundation (dependent teens are only required to do the CE foundation piece),
- Add CE to the person's IRP (without taking off any existing required work activities),
- Refer adults to colleges/ESD to complete their CE if the foundation has been completed.
- Schedule the follow-up CE interview; and,
- Modify the IRP, as required, based on the CE. Please note: The person can start to cure sanction immediately by doing current IRP activities, and then finish her or his cure based on the modified IRP.
- Actively attempt follow-up and re-engagement contacts with sanctioned persons to discuss the benefits of participation and explain how to cure sanction.
Sanction steps ACES
- Code an RE or SN on the sanctioned individual's WORK screen with the effective date of the grant reduction.
- If the person has been on WorkFirst for over 60 months, code category 3 on the TWEP Screen.
- Send ACES adverse action letter (08-001) allowing for 10 day advanced notice and adding required text:
- Who is being placed in sanction (specific person)
- What they failed to do (specific activity in IRP)
- That the specific person is in sanction status
- The penalties that will be applied to the grant
- When the penalties will be applied
- Fair hearing rights
- How to end the penalties and get out of sanction status
- Enter EX in the closure delay reason field on the ACES WORK screen for dependent teens in sanction to track the case, continue re-engagement and allow the case to remain in sanction for longer than 6 months
Please note that staff only needs to enter the information corresponding to the first three bullets. The rest of the information is automatically printed on the letter.
Sanction Steps in eJAS
- Document issues discussed and the results of the case staffing under the case staffing event type. Explain why the department decided to sanction. In addition to the eJAS Case Staffing documentation, you must include the following information:
- Document that all available information was reviewed and discussed with one or more professionals, and
- An explanation of the decision whether or not to pursue sanction.
- Complete the sanction review criteria.
- Close the non-participation components as appropriate using IC code.
- Enter SA or SN component for sanction depending on how long the person has been on WorkFirst cash assistance.
Remember to send the case staffing result letter.
Other Actions
Terminate until the person agrees to participate and start curing sanction:- Working Connections Child Care assistance (except for employment purposes), and
- Support services.
Curing the Sanction
- When a sanctioned person agrees to participate to cure the sanction, open the appropriate component(s) in eJAS (but keep the SA or SN code in place).
- Authorize any needed support services or child care and update the IRP.
- After 4 weeks of satisfactory participation is verified:
- Remove the sanction coding RE or SN on the WORK screen in ACES and enter a MP. Enter the sanction cure date in the ‘CA Re-qualifying Date' field.
- For parents who have been on WorkFirst for 60 months or more, change the ACES TWEP Screen from category 3 to category 1 or 2.
- Remove the SA or SN code from eJAS.
- Issue any supplemental benefits within five days of verification.
Note: An individual, who left WorkFirst cash assistance in sanction status and has been off cash assistance for 6 months or more, does not return to sanction status when WorkFirst cash assistance is re-opened. Be sure and remove all eJAS and ACES coding related to the previous sanction. If the person comes back onto WF cash assistance within six months, the sanction count resumes (off in month three of sanction, back on in month four of sanction).